- While corporations can exchange discrete assets of a similar character in a tax-free “like-kind” exchange, they cannot generally exchange businesses tax-free due to the fact that, under the tax rules, goodwill of a business (whether or not reflected on a company’s financial statements) is never of like-kind to goodwill of another business
- A mixing bowl structure allows two companies to exchange businesses or dissimilar assets and, if properly structured, receive a strong opinion from the client’s outside counsel that no current tax is triggered
- The two parties each contribute the assets to be exchanged to a newly created partnership
- Pursuant to the partnership agreement, each company obtains substantially all of the economics and control over the assets contributed by the other party (i.e. the assets it wanted) and relinquishes the economics and control over the assets it contributed itself (i.e. the assets it did not want)
- After a seven-year period, the partnership can be unwound and the exchange formalized, without triggering any taxes
- Company A is allocated, for example, 90% of income from and appreciation of Business B; Company B is allocated 90% of income from and appreciation of Business A; each Company is allocated 10% of income and appreciation of Business it contributed
- In the discussion that follows, we discuss a somewhat more sophisticated mixing bowl structure which still utilizes mixing bowl technology, but involves the ultimate creation of two separate partnerships; such a structure allows for better definition of control to clarify which assets each company will consolidate for financial reporting purposes
- Precedent transactions: LIN Television/NBC, AM General/MacAndrews & Forbes
Transaction Structure
The mixing bowl structure described below, like a conventional mixing bowl, allows two companies to substantially exchange ownership and control of businesses; by isolating Business A and Business B into separate partnerships, this structure provides for greater clarity in financial reporting than a conventional structure.
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|
|